MedDRA Coding
A proposed term for every verbatim, shown with its code and whether it came from an exact match or from the model. The reviewer confirms it, and the MedDRA version stays with the code.
Case Processing
Vigintake reads each incoming report, extracts the case into the E2B(R3) structure, proposes MedDRA codes and drafts the narrative. Your safety scientist reviews it against the source and exports a validated E2B(R3) file.
“The patient reported persistent nausea following the initiation of treatment. The event was reported by a healthcare professional.”
A healthcare professional reported persistent nausea in a patient following initiation of treatment.
Ready for clinical reviewEvidence and source available
The Challenge
Most of a case processor’s day goes into copying data from source documents, coding it and writing the narrative, before any medical judgement is applied.
Case processors read PDFs and emails and type the data into the safety database field by field, then check it again.
MedDRA coding choices, missing fields and inconsistent narratives send cases back for another round before they can be submitted.
Case volumes change from week to week. The 15-day and 90-day reporting deadlines do not.
How It Works
Four steps from the source document to an E2B(R3) file. The safety scientist reviews and corrects the case before it leaves.
Upload a PDF source document, a safety mailbox email or an E2B(R3) file. A follow-up is uploaded from inside its case, so it is always attached to the right record.
The data is extracted into the E2B(R3) sections for case identification, primary source, patient, reaction, drug and narrative. A MedDRA term is proposed for each verbatim.
The narrative is written in your organisation’s template, from the data in the case.
The reviewer checks every field against the source, confirms the coding and runs the E2B(R3) validation. The export is an E2B(R3) file for your safety database, with every step in the audit trail.
Capabilities
All of it is covered by the GAMP 5 validation package: URS, functional specification, risk analysis, IQ, OQ and traceability matrix.
A proposed term for every verbatim, shown with its code and whether it came from an exact match or from the model. The reviewer confirms it, and the MedDRA version stays with the code.
Narratives written in the template your organisation already uses, so every case reads the same way regardless of who processed it.
Changes from a follow-up are listed against the current values. Nothing is applied until the reviewer confirms, and the previous value is kept in the audit trail.
Six checks before export: data types, mandatory elements, a crosswalk between the file and the stored case, XPath conformance, the EMA business rules and the E2B(R3) schema.
Extracted values link back to where they appear in the source document, and the original file stays with the case in its original format.
Uploads, edits, coding decisions, status changes, validation runs and exports are recorded with user, time, previous value and new value.
Who It's for
Process cases for several clients from one system. Each client is a separate organisation with its own narrative template, users and audit trail.
Keep case processing in-house, or check the cases your PV vendor sends you, with the source and the full history of every case in one place.
Integrations
Reviewed cases leave Vigintake as E2B(R3) files, so any safety database that imports E2B(R3) can receive them. Your database stays the system of record and submission stays in your process.
Get Started
Send us two or three anonymised source documents and we will process them in the call, from upload to E2B(R3).